SEO Agency

Brightspan

Sample story

How Brightspan covered more keywords without stretching writers

Brightspan builds topical coverage around commercial pages. Writto turned keyword research into a brief the writer can actually open.

3.7×
Content Output

Figures on this page come from the stories below. They are not a blended average of every Writto account.

Company

Overview

Brightspan is an eight-person SEO studio in Denver. Most of the work is supporting articles around client money pages: comparisons, alternatives, and how-to pieces that need to match search intent.

The challenge

Keyword research, outlines, and drafts each lived in a different product. By the time a writer started, the SERP had moved and the brief was already wrong.

How they used Writto

Writto holds the research, the brief, and the live SEO score. Strategists and writers work in the same document instead of passing a stale outline down the line.

Previous workflow

Strategists exported keywords from one tool, rebuilt outlines in Docs, then dropped a link in Slack. Writers pasted that into a separate assistant and hoped the entities still matched.

Workflow

Before Writto

  1. 01Keyword research
  2. 02Multiple research tools
  3. 03Writer
  4. 04AI writing tool
  5. 05Editing
  6. 06AI detection/humanization
  7. 07SEO optimization
  8. 08Publishing

With Writto

  1. 01Research
  2. 02Write
  3. 03Humanize
  4. 04Optimize
  5. 05Publish

Results

Brightspan went from 16 ranked supporting articles a month to 59. Writers start from a brief that still matches the page they are supposed to win, so fewer pieces come back from QA for missing entities.

The brief used to go stale by the time a writer picked it up. Now research opens in the same editor as the draft, and the outline still matches the SERP.

Elena RuizHead of SEOBrightspan

Key takeaways

  • Research should open the editor, not a spreadsheet the writer never sees.
  • A live SEO score keeps the draft on the query while it is still being written.